More COP adventures took place on Saturday too, although I think we’d both confess that we were quite relieved to find out that the majority of events ended at 3pm! Saturday included:
The role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) will be vital for the implementation of the Paris agreement. NGOs come from range of sectors including research, business, industry, local governance, trade unions and indigenous peoples. The UNFCCC executive secretary argued we should work together with national policymakers to the implementation of national determined contributions of greenhouse gases. Whilst this was refuted by a few members in the forum arguing that NGOs should be involved in the negotiation process of UNFCCC that is the position we are currently assigned.
Secondly, the forum meeting to discuss the impact of the US election result (not surprisingly) brought many unhappy comments. Ultimately, there was a sense of shock at the meeting however a continued emphasis for US climate change action prevailed. Education of environmental issues will also be pushed in the upcoming years to remove the scepticism present in developed nations.
Finally to end our time at COP, we attended an informal plenary to summarise the negotiations that have taken place over the past week. Significant points from the plenary included an excitement for the 1st CMA meeting, which represents the first meeting at which components of the Paris agreement can be discussed. To begin the proceedings next week the King of Morocco, Mohammed VI of Morocco, has invited all delegates for lunch, after which discussions can take place. However amongst the excitement of next week, there was still concern that not enough was being done for pre-2020 actions and that for the Paris agreement to be achieved efforts need to take place as a matter of urgency. There was a sense of division amongst nations, with India, Nicaragua and Honduras arguing that action is required pre-2020 whilst Switzerland and Australia refuting these comments stating that more discussion needs to take place to ensure a fair process prevails. My own personal opinion is that action is required pre-2020 and that ultimately a nation shouldn’t avoid their own progress towards being carbon-neutral due to the behaviour of other nations.
Our time at COP22 has been a huge learning curve for myself and Caroline. Being at this global conference has allowed us to interact with stakeholders from around the World. For both it is our first time at a UN climate change conference, and we both hope that in the future Marrakech, 2016, will be recognised as a successful starting ground to the implementation of the Paris agreement.
Thank you to the Walker Institute, UNFCCC and the SCENARIO doctoral training partnership for making opportunity available to us. Also a huge thanks to all the PhD students and Lucy Wallace who have worked hard to ensure successful publicity of our work.
Everyone keeping well caffeinated at our NIMFRU meeting last month in Kampala, Uganda #Coffee @SHEAR_Programme https://t.co/LnW5OhTWl5
11:15 AM - 21 Jun 2019
Would knowing about effect of climate change on individual events be useful for policymakers in impacted countries?… https://t.co/z9UaB4W4Ri
11:30 AM - 20 Jun 2019
We are combining information from crop models and sweet potato experts to better understand how climate change will… https://t.co/NA2oJcSjej
10:30 AM - 20 Jun 2019
...and @hannah_r_young found it was likely that greenhouse gas emissions had actually decreased the likelihood of… https://t.co/6WdMpxm8hH
09:32 AM - 20 Jun 2019
In 2012 there was flooding across much of West Africa. @hannah_r_young used climate models to look at how climate c… https://t.co/r6oxwPYYcx
09:32 AM - 20 Jun 2019
To support effective climate adaptation by people designing, implementing and monitoring interdisciplinary research… https://t.co/1MyixiWlAd
17:00 PM - 19 Jun 2019